This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Shopping CentersWikipedia:WikiProject Shopping CentersTemplate:WikiProject Shopping CentersShopping center articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mid-City Mall/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Class rated as stub. The article is well referenced from off line sources, add online reference or external link. The article is lacking a photograph and infobox for a company (see Green Tree Mall for example). The article needs some cleanup and needs to be checked for a nuetral point of view. Sections like Decline presents information about "bums" which is cited with an offline reference but the prose doesn't read that way and should refer to the reference source in order not to appear written within in the nuetral point of view.
Importance rate as mid for the articles economic impact on a section of a large city. The age of the property can hold a historical meaning for some residents or area historians.
Thanks for the assessment. I will get a picture at some point but online sources seem unlikely. The mall does not yet have a webpage as far as I can tell... sources with meaningful information on the mall are a few books and old, offline newspaper articles. I will look at the "bums" thing, good point. --W.marsh01:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Class reassessed as Start. Still lacking online sources, but structured and written well. Picture has been added. Features section could use more references. —Ost (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Why on earth do they need to be online references? We can only have B-class or better articles if someone has made a webpage about the topic? This is a silly and completely fictional requirement... offline books and newspapers are actually better sources than 99% of webpages. --Movingday29 (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Last edited at 23:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 23:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
