Talk:Midwestern University
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Melchior2006 in topic Fraternities and clubs
Midwestern University has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 18, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Midwestern University article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Arizona may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Midwestern University/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: InterestGather (talk · contribs) 21:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Occasional original research, I have cleaned it up.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Numerous occasions of unnecessary topics in unrelated sections, one example includes the mention of "no criminal arrests" on the Glendale campus in an unrelated campus. I have corrected this.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Previous edit wars, however due to the decent time passed since their occurrence (over 2 years) I do not believe it is unreasonable to say the conflict has concluded.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- After some necessary corrections, the article fits all six good article criteria, does not meet the immediate fail criteria and therefor will be pushed forward.
- Pass/Fail:
Fraternities and clubs
editThis passage is largely unsourced; the references are only to other lists and don't convey information of encyclopedic value. The Greek lists are also not exhaustive; the criteria for inclusion here are unclear. The clubs are simply listed but again, this is not the place for lists. I propose deletion. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Since no one has chimed in on this one, I will go ahead and streamline. --Melchior2006 (talk) 18:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)