Talk:Migdal HaEmek
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.
|
Move
edit- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 10:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
The official Israel Central Bureau of Statistics spelling does not use apostrophe. - Gilgamesh 06:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support, I'll try to bring it up against on WP:RM. -- Y Ynhockey || Talk Y 10:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Removed spam
editI removed a comment by 87.68.109.200 (talk · contribs) that included text now regarded as spam by Wikipedia. It can be found at this diff. Tim Pierce 18:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
File:Migdal-haemek-municipality.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Migdal-haemek-municipality.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |