Talk:Migration (2023 film)/GA2

Latest comment: 20 hours ago by Brachy0008 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Zingo156 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

hi! it’s brachy, back for another review (it’s been a while lol). anyways… better get out of the woods review as soon as possible ;D

Lead

edit
  • Box office, runtime and budget not in the body
The box office is in the body as is the budget (The latter is at the end of the first paragraph in the Development and writing section) Zingo156 (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
found the box office and the budget. No runtime in the body brachy08 (chat here lol) 01:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

edit
  • Pretty concerningly high (62.5%)
    • FN 25 has the highest violation (42.5%), especially in the lead.
    • In summary, you might want to paraphrase the lead by a significant bit
That first source, the Deviantart page with a 97.0% similarity rating, copied and pasted Wikipedia, there is no denying that. But I would make a case that the second one, the When To Stream source with a 42.5% similarity, did so as well. That page was published on January 8, 2024 and this was the state of this Wikipedia page a couple of days earlier. The lead is the same. Zingo156 (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The When to Stream page was actually published on January 17, so I think it is safe to say that they copied and pasted off the Wikipedia article's lead. Zingo156 (talk) 05:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
fair enough. brachy08 (chat here lol) 10:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Production and development

edit
  • FN 1 does not talk about Guylo Homsy
  • FN 2 does not mention Patrick Imbert.
  • FN 3 does not mention The Big Bad Fox and Other Tales...
  • statingstating that
Taken care of! Zingo156 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Last thing has been sorted! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Animation and design

edit
  • requires backgrounds to be fully visualized and rendered instead of suggested seems like a weird style of wording. (Try re-paraphrasing everything needed to be shown)
  • FN 9 does not say anything about Meledandri requesting the clouds scene in Migration.
  • Where does FN 15 say that Powell and Renner connected over their love of classical music? It only says that Renner is a huge classical music fan.
Done! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Release

edit
  • FN 21 does not contain stereoscopic.
  • FN 19 does not talk about Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken.
  • Is FN 23-4 reliable? Additionally, their names aren't formatted properly but that should be an easy fix.
  • Is FN 26 reliable?
  • FN 27-8 does not mention June 19, 2025
All dealt with! Zingo156 (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Box office

edit
  • FN 14 and 17 are unreliable.
Film Music Reporter is unreliable? But it is used in so many good articles. Zingo156 (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
No I am pretty sure it is considered reliable. I found this 2023 discussion. Zingo156 (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
i’ll let this one slide. anyways, some points are left unaddressed but they should be easy fixes. anyways, the final point is well… source archives, but i’ll do it for you. brachy08 (chat here lol) 23:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Critical response

edit
  • La CroixLa Croix's Stephane Dreyfus
  • FN 39 does not mention anything about predictability.