Talk:Migration Policy Institute

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

WOT

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not sure why Web of Trust has any comments listing their site as spam or phishing... it's full of legitimate content and MPI is well-known and well-respected. 108.28.12.129 (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Web of Trust considers their website to be fairly unsafe, and the comments on its scorecard include some listing it as a spammer. --187.141.98.211 (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Criticism section

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Generally speaking, criticism sections are an inappropriate way to structure information per WP:CSECTION. This one in particular was particularly WP:UNDUE - one relatively mild and subjective criticism of one report, coming from a fairly WP:BIASED source, clearly doesn't meet the standard for inclusion. Additionally, the section severely oversold the one factoid it presented - an op-ed by their ideological opponents disagreeing with the math in one report isn't "several reports", and it's misleading to describe them one person on the other side of the issue "immigration analysts." --Aquillion (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic