Talk:Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd v Zimbabwe
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI created the article, with two sections: "Background" and "The Decision." I intend to expand both sections in the coming weeks. Trsg (talk) 00:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The "undos" made on September 3, 2009 were due to the deletion of a reference after an edit. Other references that referred back to the deleted reference became orphan, and a full original reference had to be introduced in the appropriate place. Trsg (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Pvt
editWhat does "Pvt" (in the case name) mean? Apokrif (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I believe it just means "private." Trsg (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Statements at Westminster Hall by Benjamin John Freeth
editThese were added to the "Post-Development Decisions" section. Interesting comments, but I don't see how they affect the case or why they constitute a "development." I propose that everything from "Intervention of the Uncle..." until "birthday honors 2010" be deleted. Trsg (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Successful seizure of Zim assets in South Africa
editPerhaps some mention could be made of the applicants' success in seizing Zimbabwe government assets in South Africa, eg. [1]? - htonl (talk) 23:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well spotted - done 85.210.192.172 (talk) 22:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)