Talk:Mike IX Williams

Cleanup needed

RE: APRIL 2020 ROLLBACK BY JACKINTHEBOX- This Wikipedia entry is incredibly factually incorrect and the artist wishes his Wikipedia page to undergo major revisions. We've just began making the very first of these edits and the edits keep getting rolled back. Stop. This is not your vanity project, this is a real person's public information which needs to be factually correct. You cited our edits as "vandalism". Changing factually incorrect information, for instance changing the word "prison" to "jail" (he's never been to prison and it's not our fault that you don't know the difference) and changing the display of Mike IX Williams' professional name and given birth name to reflect correctly are not vandalism. Changing the intro paragraph to reflect Mike IX Williams' other endeavors including the name of his book (with citations included) is NOT vandalism. The page, as it is, appears to be written by a 14 year old. It is rife with factually incorrect information and grammatical errors. Please stop. -lisa.kippon

Wow, this page is a mess of grammar problems and is not very encyclopedic at all. Is anyone doing any upkeep here? NObodyNOWHERE (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Apparently not. It appears that a mentally-handicapped monkey from the planet Zentar-5 wrote the majority of this article. This is the grammatical equivalent of deicide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.18.237 (talk) 07:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Someone really needs to fix all of the grammar problems in this article, the "stance (sic) in prison" section in particular. I don't have the patience, personally, and I don't find that much of this is actually important enough to keep in the article anyways. For instance, should his "drug addiction" really have its' own category? He is just a relatively unknown metal vocalist, not necessarily someone who should have such an in-depth (albeit poorly-written) and non-cited entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.116.18.237 (talk) 16:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Good point, I have no idea why this person has an article at all. Competing sycophants seem to be the only people who care. I might put up a notability warning. Mercster (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mike Williams (singer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070407180252/http://decibelmagazine.com:80/features/aug2005/eyehategod.aspx to http://www.decibelmagazine.com/features/aug2005/eyehategod.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mike IX Williams/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Someone really needs to fix all of the grammar problems in this article, the "stance (sic) in prison" section in particular. I don't have the patience, personally, and I don't find that much of this is actually important enough to keep in the article anyways. For instance, should his "drug addiction" really have its' own category? He is just a relatively unknown metal vocalist, not necessarily someone who should have such an in-depth (albeit poorly-written) and non-cited entry.

Last edited at 16:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)