Talk:Mike Kafka/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by YellowMonkey in topic Mike Kafka GA Review

Mike Kafka GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  • MOS: good, nbsps are in order structure.
  • Flow: There are a lot of really short paragraphs, one for each game. These should be merged to give a more logical flow. Also, with the season, are there not any trends? The article simply consists of a list of results. If he eg, started the season not so productively, and his stats went up in the middle of the season, and then declined, this should be mentioned. Some of this should be put in the article to give the sections more shape and less of a listy feel.
  • Sources:Pass RS.
  • Style of play: Why is there not any discussion of this? What is this person good/bad at? Fast running? dodging tackles? Good vision of 3-4 passes ahead? Strong at tackling? Accurate passing?
Subjective material is allowed if there is a disclaimer as such. It seems odd but in NFL/baseball/NHL, US type sports the articles tend to avoid discussing player style whereas soccer and cricket articles do not YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 04:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 02:59, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'll work on finishing this up at some point today.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 16:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
that's fine YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 00:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply