Talk:Mike Panetta
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Superdelegate Status
editMike Panetta is not a superdelegate. This post from Democratic Convention Watch has it directly from Panetta that he is not a superdelegate. Even though the Democratic Call to Convention says that one of DC's add-ons must be used for its shadow representative, the DC selection plan (which was approved by the DNC) did not call for that. Whereas the shadow senators and congressional delegate are automatically superdelegates by virtue of their positions, the shadow representative is not. Panetta says he is hoping to be selected as a pledged PLEO, but that would be a spot that has already been counted for Obama in the results of the DC primary. Panetta wil not be a superdelegate this year. I don't know whether any of this (or the fact that he has endorsed Obama) is worth putting in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galois E (talk • contribs) 01:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately Panetta wasn't selected as a pledged PLEO or a pledged at-large delegate either. So he won't be a delegate, super or otherwise. The shadow rep gets no respect, even from the DC Democratic Party. KCinDC (talk) 18:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Panetta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.washingtoninformer.com/Voters%20Guide%20REVISED%2006.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725221954/http://www.dcboee.org/election_info/election_results/results_2010.asp?prev=0&electionid=4&result_type=3 to http://www.dcboee.org/election_info/election_results/results_2010.asp?prev=0&electionid=4&result_type=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)