Talk:Mike Pelfrey

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Michael or Mike?

edit

Though Michael is his given birthname, Pelfrey in all cases as I've ever heard him named, is usually called Mike. If someone can find a source that says he prefers Michael, thats all I need. I just think the title of the article is better suited as Mike Pelfrey. Mike Piazza's page isn't Michael Piazza, his given name. I just see it as an inconsistancy. Wxthewx99 03:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sounds reasonable to me. http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/team/player.jsp?player_id=460059 agrees. I'd say go ahead and move it. This article's been around a while - it may have been less clear when it was created. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit

Michael PelfreyMike Pelfrey — as per above -- Mike is how he's known on MLB.com, ESPN.com, etc. —Amazins490 (talk) 19:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

This article has been renamed from Michael Pelfrey to Mike Pelfrey as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 20:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Pelfrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Pelfrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply