Talk:Mike Storey

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: rough consensus not to move. Andrewa (talk) 14:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

---

Mike Storey → Mike Storey, Baron Storey.

Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This peer is no longer wholly or exclusively known by his pre-peerage nomenclature. Kittybrewster ☎ 17:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - Know for being a local councillor and for being Lord Mayor and Leader of Liverpool Council and not as a peer. Also disambiguation is not required for this article title.--Lucy-marie (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

• Oppose WP:RECENTISM, and quite clearly this person is not known as Baron Storey, since he got the title in November 2010, and this is just February 2011. Further, he got the title due to acomplishments made before having the title, as this is a life-peer and not heritable, so is clearly not because he's known for being a baron. Further as a Lord Mayor, he did not have the title, showing he is not known by the title. WP:PRECISE - don't use preemptive disambiguation, and use concise titles. 64.229.101.119 (talk) 06:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose, not well known as a peer, and this is another of those where it would look ridiculous to combine the forename (in its colloquial form - "Mike" rather than "Michael") with the hyperformal "Baron".--Kotniski (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mike Storey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211003805/http://www.civichalls.liverpool.gov.uk/lordmayor/index.asp to http://www.civichalls.liverpool.gov.uk/lordmayor/index.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720075202/http://blogs.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/dalestreetblues/2010/05/leaders-of-liverpool-city-coun.html to http://blogs.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/dalestreetblues/2010/05/leaders-of-liverpool-city-coun.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928013158/http://www.plantationprimary.co.uk/ to http://www.plantationprimary.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)