Talk:Mikhail Grabovski

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Oz Man Can in topic troubles with the law

Rookie Season error and NPOV

edit

"He has since become a valuable player to their team, being among the top NHL rookies in goal scoring throughout the 2008–09 season." The 08-09 season wasn't his rookie season, the 07-08 season was. Also, the sentence is kinda POV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.58.85 (talk) 06:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

troubles with the law

edit

I just reverted a revert about Grabovski's bar incident. I figure it belongs. Opinions? Dbrodbeck (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I just thought that since it was such a minor story, and since nothing followed, it was just fluff at this point. Unlike Patrick Kane where it was in the news a lot and actually went to court, this just seemed too insignificant for his biography. Just my opinion.--Львівське (talk) 05:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ryan O'Byrne's is still there, though I imagine it could go too. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
O'Byrne was charged and had to do community service, so it may be notable to include, whereas Grabovski was released without charge.--Львівське (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, we still have it for Andrei Kostitsyn too, no charges there, perhaps this should go as well. I see your point on oByrne though. Dbrodbeck (talk) 19:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think this page is definitely missing some note about the incident. I believe it most definitely belongs on here.Oz Man Can (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Grabovskicelebrationoct2011.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Grabovskicelebrationoct2011.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)Reply