Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 1, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 25, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Soviet Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS prototype of the early 1940s had an electrically operated variable-incidence horizontal stabilizer?

Untitled

The initial version of this article was based on a material from aviation.ru. It has been released under the GFDL by the copyright holder.

GA Review

Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
A few grammar smoothings are required - for instance, "with service designation MiG-5 was reserved" is rather awkward. The Russian words defining OKO should be italicised, for two examples. Also, the "design and development" section should be subdivided, I believe - the flight testing should be in a seperate section/subsection.
All done, I believe.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References are accurate and reliable, without OR. While technically meeting the requirement I think the long paragraphs shouldn't be cited just at the end - it's an invitation for later additions to "pretend" to be referenced.
My articles may be hijacked later on, but I'll take that risk.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Placing this on hold while the above comments are addressed. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Good to go. Nice work. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic