Talk:Miles Davis, Vol. 2

Fair use rationale for Image:Miles Davis volume2.png

Image:Miles Davis volume2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

_______________________________________________

I added a second chronological tier so this entry could participate in the chronology of Miles' 10"LPs, as well as the existing 12" sequence

sorry the header is blue but I see that is the template for studio albums, and the green headers indicate a compilation, so unasthaetic as the colour clash may be blue is correct

otherwise I see an issue with the infobox as it stands because it is describing the 12"LP (catalog number, total time), whereas the current text barely acknowledges the 12"LP, instead describing the current CD issue (or more precisely a current CD issue), and incidentally that this CD repackages the original 10"LP with bonus tracks

I think the article might be better stating "Volume 2 is the title of a 10"LP, a 12"LP, and a CD, each with a unique tracklisting" etc, as the 12"LP was the common version for at least thirty years, and even the current text acknowledges some CD versions follow the 12" tracklisting ... info and tracklistings for each format using the title "Miles Davis Volume 2" should follow

when I get a chance I may add the classic 12" tracklisting to this and the "Volume 1" entry, and make them both less CD-centric, if I can figure out a non-disruptive way to add to the existing text

J Edward Malone (talk) 22:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

_______________________________________________

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miles Davis Volume 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306002016/http://www.downbeat.com/default.asp?sect=stories&subsect=story_detail&sid=761 to http://www.downbeat.com/default.asp?sect=stories&subsect=story_detail&sid=761

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)