Talk:Miles Marshall Lewis
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Miles Marshall Lewis be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Votes for Deletion
edit- This article should be deleted on the basis of vanity. This person does not have enough notoriety to be considered worthy of a Wikipedia entry.69.87.160.8 20:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I vote to Keep. He has written works, 4 of which are easily found on Amazon.com. He has been reviewed by NPR and the Village Voice. I was able to get this information by putting his name into Amazon, Google, and Wikipedia!! What is so unworthy of Wikipedia about him, the fact he hasn't killed anybody?
- Do you have a vendetta against Mr. Lewis? Who continuously flags articles for deletion but doesn't register an account? There are too many Morehouse students on here for you to continue like that. Learn how to use Wikipedia before you start trying to delete articles. I'm not sure if you even did it right. -- (why doesn't my sig link?)Crnk Mnky 07:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mml 1.JPG
editImage:Mml 1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.