Talk:Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 May 2021.

Wikipedia

Climate change High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

It needs to have a paragraph explaining that it makes no difference whatsoever (having them dig up less oil will just let other companies dig up what they don't), and that the company's actions are irrelevant (the problem is with the people that buy the oil burning that oil, not the supplier).

The request to include this point in the article seems to contradict WP:NPOV. While it is possible that this could be the a potential outcome, it is an opinion which could introduce basis into the article. Jurisdicta (talk) 04:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

"buyers"

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Concerning the Guardian info "the reduction targets include emissions from its suppliers and buyers", does that include emissions from direct buyers (such as a third-party gas station) only or the end-use of the energy products (such as a private car)? Any source for that? --173.68.165.114 (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

It makes no difference. It would be just like the british government getting the companies that 'safely' dispose of nuclear waste to sign a piece of paper saying they do it safely - they just dump it in the ocean either way. And hell will freeze over before any human being starts to care enough about the planet Earth to actually give something up - least of all their oh so essential car. --92.24.68.197 (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic