Talk:Military history detachment
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ukexpat in topic Title?
 | A fact from Military history detachment appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title?
editMilitary History Detachment or Military history detachment? – ukexpat (talk) 01:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- My thought was that it is a type of official military unit always capalized in the references that I saw. I mean, you wouldn't do 101st Airborne Division as 101st airborne division, would you? Sadads (talk) 11:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Not quite. The article is about the generic military history detachment, not about a particular one. So just as we we would say that the 101st Airborne Division is a specific airborne division, we would say that the 46th Military History Detachment is a specific military history detachment. Indeed the first and third references refer to them as "military history detachments". – ukexpat (talk) 02:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)