Talk:Millennial Day Theory

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 2600:1700:D4F0:33E0:98D5:DD2B:C13:C633 in topic New Theory

Inaccurate Intro Paragraph

edit

The introductory paragraph begins with " ...is a theory in Christian eschatology in which...". This should be removed. The millennial day theory is described in pre-Christian Jewish sources, and many Rabbinic sources in the Talmud. The Millennial Day Theory did not originate with Christianity at all, it is thoroughly Jewish. Even to this day the Rabbi's teach that the Messiah has the return on or before the year 6000.

Clarifications

edit

I'm familiar with variants of these millenarist beliefs, but was surprised to see United-States establishment and scientific revolution in the table. It would be nice for the article to be expanded to explain how they link scripture to those events (and who holds these views, among Day Millenarists). —PaleoNeonate22:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

There is the verse in Daniel that says "But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase"
That some take to reference increase in scientific understanding in the end times. Though i am not sure about the US thing 98.25.242.5 (talk) 00:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reason for reverting my edit

edit

Hello MOTORAL1987, Instead of posting your "reason" as a "reply" in Talk, for others to comment on, you removed my Talk message to you under "Millennial Day Theory" and then gave your reason at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Millennial_Day_Theory&diff=prev&oldid=1157257958 which is: "(Restoring as posting a personal message on a article page is not appropriate)". My edit is based on information and "clues" I have read and that is why I made the addition to "Millennial Day Theory" as 'New "Theory"' (using quoted references to support my "theory"). I do not understand how this edit/additional information is different than any of the existing information in the Wikipedia "Millennial Day Theory". What do you mean by your reason/answer? Do you not agree with my "reason" for the edit or the edit itself? Ggiraldi (talk) 13:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

First of all this article is not for the promotion of specific theories no matter how much you might believe in it and also your changes were of such that it affectively vandalised the article that’s why I removed it, I don’t appreciate personal messages on the article page so I have no further wish to comment or desire for further communication with you. Thank you (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 17:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC))Reply

New Theory

edit

Hello visitors to the Talk page of "Millennial Day Theory", On May 22, 2023, I added/edited new information theory which was reverted on May 24, 2023. Does anyone of you want to read any new theory information about/on the article "Millennial Day Theory"? If so, what form and punctuation should it take (as a start, I can remove quotation marks around the word Theory and add question marks after "statement" sentences)? Ggiraldi (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think it is important that the Sabbath Millennium is connected to David. Of all the notable Biblical characters, God's promise to David is treated as spiritual, figurative, or entirely fulfilled in Christ. All of these interpretations may be true, but still all of the other promises and covenants of God have had a literal expression. David may have a significant role in this millennium. Shalom. 2600:1700:D4F0:33E0:98D5:DD2B:C13:C633 (talk) 00:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply