Talk:Millennium Group
Millennium Group has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 24, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editFor an August 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Millennium Group
This article is great and really fascinating! -- 66.2.146.89 20:12, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I think the "110 AD" is a typographical error that has crept in over the ages. The original revision had it as "10", as does the posting which is the source of much of the original article, and the cited timeline on Geocities. Somehow I missed this on first rewrite. 60.46.249.243 07:59, 20 February 2006 (UTC) But 10 AD is a nonsense, there were no christians in 10 AD!!!! and no persecution against them until Nero (c. 70 AD) 83.97.184.15 02:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Needs a lot of work
editI cleaned up a couple grammar mistakes, but this article needs a lot of work. It's full of sentence fragments, they style is juvenile, and it needs to cite sources. I barely watched Millenium so I don't know where to go for the sources. thx1138 05:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Configuration — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.36.184.225 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Gnostic references
editIt's a while since I saw the show, but I think some episodes (e.g. The Hand of Saint Sebastian) as well as some of the episodes in the end of the second series and some third series episodes hinted that the Grouop has Gnostic origins. Autarch (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Millennium Group/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 01:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: GRAPPLE X
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Episode 14 (Twin Peaks), Gender Bender (The X-Files), Deep Throat (The X-Files episode), Episode 2 (Twin Peaks) & Squeeze (The X-Files)
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: Episode 14 (Twin Peaks), Gender Bender (The X-Files), Deep Throat (The X-Files episode), Episode 2 (Twin Peaks) & Squeeze (The X-Files)
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, Grapple X, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! GRAPPLE X 00:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Image Needs Replacing
editWhile the Millennium group used an Ouroboros as their logo, it looked nothing like this one, with a much simpler design. Can we use a shot from the show itself? 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:6AF8 (talk) 13:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)