Talk:Mills Observatory

Latest comment: 3 years ago by JoeNMLC in topic Assessment

Untitled

edit

The information and sources includes talking with the curator and astronomer Dr. Bill Samson, at the Mills Observatory, pamphlets and various leaflets and books available at the Observatory. Dr. Samson provided a lot of information, including Thomas Flood's Historical Survey and images for the use of Wikipedia. I will update the Sources list sooner.--Cyril Thomas 16:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Presentations

edit

Dr. William Samson, curator and astronomer at the Mills Observatory offered abundant information by presenting documents, talks, emails and images of Mills Observatory. Robert Law, at the Mills Observatory also provided a lot of information for this article.--Cyril Thomas 14:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mills Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

planetarium comments

edit

I worked for Viewlex on their Apollo planetarium models. All projected exactly 950 stars (so you might want to correct the number in the article), effectively those brighter than magnitude +4.65 and north of -70 degrees south latitude (further south being blocked by the mounting). However, there were four models, including the Apollo Portable (one of which I own). The other models, I, II, and III, have progressively improving abilities in terms of the ability to design automated shows. Each purchased Apollo (except the portables) came with two free automated shows, while more could be purchased (I wrote about one third of all the available shows). Thomas Wm. Hamilton 4897 Tomhamilton

Assessment

edit

At first glance, this article is almost "Complete". It just needs additional references. So for now, I set class to "Start". JoeNMLC (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply