Talk:Milton Blockhouse
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi in topic GA Review
 | Milton Blockhouse has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 31, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Milton Blockhouse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll take this one, probably over the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox check
Prose/content/structure
- Let me know if my copyedit changed any meaning.
- I notice "Device plan" links to Device Forts, which is fine, just want to check if "plan" should be capitalised.
- Level of detail seems fine for this subject -- poor old fort didn't have much of a career, did it?!
Referencing
- Fully cited and sources look reliable.
- Formatting generally seems fine although I think you're using hyphens for page ranges and I believe MOS still favours short dashes.
Images
- Appropriately licensed/captions.
- File:Gravesend defences 1588 Thamesis Descriptio.png doesn't have alt text, although admittedly it's not a requirement.
Look forward to seeing you apply your talents to more articles on Henry's device forts, especially Deal! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Changes should be done now; I think that Device plan is probably OK... Deal is definitely on the list! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hey the same can be said for the whole series of Device Fort articles! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- This is a great little article, and very well deserving of its new status. Well done! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Fortuna! Hchc2009 (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)