 | A fact from Milton Loch appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 December 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Dr. T. N. Dixon mistook an island in Milton Loch for an ancient crannog? Source: https://canmore.org.uk/site/72521/milton-loch
- ALT1: ... that Milton Loch is home to the sites of three crannogs, including one older than the Roman Empire? Source: https://canmore.org.uk/site/72519/milton-loch?u= https://canmore.org.uk/site/65046/milton-loch https://canmore.org.uk/site/65047/milton-loch
- ALT2: ... that the crannogs of Milton Loch, although similar in design, span a time period of around 1,000 years? Source: https://canmore.org.uk/site/72519/milton-loch?u= https://canmore.org.uk/site/65046/milton-loch https://canmore.org.uk/site/65047/milton-loch
- ALT2a: ... that some of the crannogs of Milton Loch are around 1,000 years apart, but the design remains largely unchanged?
- Reviewed: [[]]
- Comment: QPQ doesn't apply as this is my first ever DYK nomination.
Created by Schminnte (talk). Self-nominated at 21:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC).
Hi @Schminnte:, welcome to DYK. Article is long and new enough, but I have a couple minor issues with referencing:
- First sentence/paragraph in "Guido's excavations" has no inline citations.
- The naming after the nearby hamlet also has no citations. If it's "obvious", but there's no written source explicitly saying that, I'd say remove that half-sentence.
- Otherwise, no copyvio detected, and the original hook sounds good (will probably get readers to think "what's a crannog?"). Juxlos (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Juxlos:, I've fixed those issues you noticed. Thanks very much for your feedback. Schminnte (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
good to go then. Juxlos (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Schminnte and Juxlos: Hi there! Article looks good :) Unfortunately, I'm not sure I'd say the first hook is up to snuff – the first simply says that someone mistakenly thought an island was man-made, and I generally find that when users don't understand a hook, they don't stick around for very long. The second hook is okay, but could something else be found? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron:, I've added a new hook and updated ALT1. As for the first hook, I personally prefer ALT1 anyway. Schminnte (talk) 10:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've added an ALT2a – I'll tick both as cited and interesting. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron:, I've added a new hook and updated ALT1. As for the first hook, I personally prefer ALT1 anyway. Schminnte (talk) 10:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Schminnte and Juxlos:
- Thanks @Juxlos:, I've fixed those issues you noticed. Thanks very much for your feedback. Schminnte (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
