Talk:Milwaukee Ballet

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Excessive Details Removed

edit

I removed a fair amount of content from the article for a couple of reasons and just wanted to leave my reasoning here. First, there was a staff listing from multiple years ago that is now outdated. Second, the amount of detail for such a staff listing was excessive for Wikipedia, turning the article into more of a directory, which is not really the purpose. A list of personnel or former personnel who are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles would be fine, if someone wants to add something like that.

Also, I would like to note that one of the previous editors is someone who, on their user page, indicates that they are affiliated with the organization, a definite conflict of interest (Wikipedia:COI).

Lastly, I also removed a mention of the organization's sponsors, as that blurs the line of appropriateness, considering that the reference for the claim was from the Ballet itself. To me that's using Wikipedia as a way to give free publicity rather than to merely inform. Wantonlife (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Milwaukee Ballet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply