- 23:17, 20 Jan 2005 — Analogy: Mental:physical::software:hardware
- 09:37, 31 May 2005 — Attempt to Clean Up
- 06:29, 12 July 2005 — Awkward wording in 'arguements for'
- 09:51, 17 February 2006 — In a mess
- 00:11, 8 November 2005 — Biological Naturalism
- 23:45, 14 January 2006 — Additions Forthcoming
- 17:19, 15 February 2006 — i don't know how to put this.
- 15:41, 17 February 2006 — I have removed the NPOV warning
- 18:02, 22 February 2006 — Lead
- 08:23, 25 February 2006 — Ok, that's it
- 09:23, 21 February 2007 — simplicity counterargument
- 08:10, 6 March 2006 — Argument from biological development
- 09:39, 25 March 2006 — Argument from brain damage
- 16:53, 26 March 2006 — Do you know what I'd suggest if this were a philosophy course?
- 10:45, 29 March 2006 — You get the idea??
- 12:34, 30 March 2006 — Notice the difference
- 02:09, 1 May 2006 — Naturalistic dualism
- 01:54, 8 October 2007 — scientific arguments for dualism
- 07:51, 17 July 2006 — Pleasant Surprise
- 07:45, 26 September 2006 — error?
- 09:28, 3 November 2006 — Article strongly biased in favor of dualism
- 10:14, 14 November 2006 — Definition of "Cartesian dualism" needed
- 11:18, 14 November 2006 — No original research!
- 09:51, 22 November 2006 — Occam's razor
- 11:48, 9 March 2007 — GA review
- 09:30, 23 March 2007 — Long occasionalism edit
- 13:34, 2 May 2007 — Occasionalism
- 16:53, 12 June 2007 — New section on neuro-dualism is not bad
- 01:14, 1 April 2008 — Emergent Dualism - William Hasker
- 09:06, 18 August 2008 — Big Problem
- 16:10, 11 September 2008 — Argument from Brain Damage.
- 19:02, 23 November 2008 — Argument from Reason
- 22:04, 14 October 2003 — Comments
- 00:33, 8 February 2005 — Section in Italics
- 07:46, 30 October 2005 — Ryle
- 13:59, 13 May 2006 — Recursive link to Substance_Dualism
- 00:14, 18 March 2009 — EXTERNAL LINKS FOR THIS PAGE
- 04:20, 23 April 2009 — Dubious statement
- 00:53, 12 May 2009 — Removed an uncited and disputed fact.