Talk:Ming-Ming Zhou

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ming-Ming Zhou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121013102145/http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20060019296/fulltext.html to http://www.patentstorm.us/applications/20060019296/fulltext.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721072339/http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week37/OG/classification/classGroup_53.htm to http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week37/OG/classification/classGroup_53.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mssm.edu/eti/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Grant funding, in-article source notes, and research/patent blurb

Hi Wikipedians,

Is the information on grants and funding received really necessary for this article? It seems out of place and promotional rather than contributing to the encyclopedic knowledge, especially in its current location. I have the same question about the listed number of research articles published and patents owned.

Additionally, since I am a new contributor, I'd like to ask you all if the in-article source notes (e.g., "(Nature 1999)") should be removed as the information is already in the footnote associated with the citation.

Thank you! AlexTheAwkward (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)