Talk:Mingulay

Latest comment: 25 days ago by Z1720 in topic GA concerns
Good articleMingulay has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 11, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 31, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that after two thousand years or more of continuous habitation the Scottish island of Mingulay (pictured: old school house) was abandoned by its residents in 1912?
Current status: Good article

Old comments

edit

The Wikipedia page says Mingulay has been abandoned since 1934. The Lonely Isles page says ""Mingulay has a long history of settlement with many archaeological sites in evidence, but its population rapidly declined from a total of 135 inhabitants in 1901 to none in 1912 when Mingulay lost its community for good.". I know it's still true to say it's been abandoned since 1934 if it was abandoned earlier, but can anyone confirm whether the Lonely Isles information is accurate? DavidFarmbrough 08:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I checked with Haswell_Smith's The Scottish Islands, which is about the most authorative book on the general subject and he says gives 1912 as the date of abandonment too.--JBellis 14:35, 22 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Substantial expansion uploaded today. Although there is a separate Mingulay Boat Song article it is uncategorised, unreferenced and generally begging for clean up, so I included the key information here. Ben MacDui (Talk) 15:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

in fiction

edit

Mingulay is the name of an isolated human colony in Ken MacLeod's Cosmonaut Keep et seq. Now I know why! —Tamfang 19:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA nomination

edit

While reviewing the article for GA I noticed that the lead does not really summarise the article. Some of the stuff about the retreat of ice and geology should probably go into the Geography and prehistory section. Additionally more could be added to the lead regarding the overall history and culture of the island, and in particular its current condition. Other than that I thought the article was very good and look forward to being able to pass it in a couple of days. - Suicidalhamster 01:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The new lead is much better and means that the article passes the GA criteria in my opinion. Passing article. - Suicidalhamster 22:36, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mingulay Reef and shark spawning grounds

edit

BBC article makes it look like there is a chunk to add to this page. EdwardLane (talk) 08:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

More primitive than St Kilda

edit

There are many reasons why Mingulay should have been "more primitive" than St Kilda. To say that "Mingulay is less than a third of the distance from "The Long Island" that Hirta is, yet a 19th-century visitor commented that the former was "much more primitive than St Kilda, especially as regards the cottars' and crofters' houses", suggesting that the lack of a permanent landing was of greater import than sheer distance" is false. Lack of a permanent landing, or distance from the Long Island, are not necessarily even relevant to "primitiveness". Natural wealth, fishing, agricultural methods, soils, weather, religion, landownership etc are all more likely to be determinants of primitiveness.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mingulay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mingulay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mingulay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is a lot of uncited text.
  • The "Mingulay Boat Song" seems way too long, and should be incorporated into a "Culture" section, with the information moved to Mingulay Boat Song.

Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 19:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply