Talk:Minimal surface

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Bug: The picture of a soap film on a cubic frame is *not* a minimal surface. The bubble in the center has positive mean curvature, as it must being an enclosed bubble -- its edge angles are 120 degrees by Plateau's laws, which can only happen in a cube with positive curvature (and positive internal pressure). Also, needless to say, it has singularities. Can someone take a picture of a mobius strip film or the like? Would be much more illustrative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.30.6.175 (talk) 05:58, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge of soap film into minimal surface

edit

Oppose. The reason given by Drini for the merge tag is that the article is a one-liner. But these are distinct subjects. Soap films are minimal surfaces, but they are an important class that have been extensively studied; their study also involves non-mathematical aspects. The theory of minimal surfaces in general is not concerned with soap films in particular. Also of concern is that many people are not interested in the theory of minimal surfaces but are looking for information on soap films. An article on soap films could be written in a much more accessible manner. --C S (Talk) 21:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

speed/velocity

edit

Can someone check the definition of how a helicoid is formed in this article? The velocity is obviously continuously changing? Is speed what is meant? I'm unsure if "uniform" is a good word to use here too.. thanks, 213.48.15.234 10:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clarify please

edit

This article seems to make no attempt at describing what a minimal surface is. Could someone do that please? -Oreo Priest talk 02:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why revert?

edit

To User:Compsonheir: could you please explain, why did you throw away my contribution to this article? Should I revert back? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Having no answer from User:Compsonheir I revert. I am open to criticism, but I believe that my contribution was not a vandalism and therefore should not be deleted without any explanation, why. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 18:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minimal surface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply