Talk:Miniopterus mahafaliensis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Twilight Helryx 16:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up this review. I just applied a series of changes per the previous GANs for species of this group. Ucucha 17:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

• Looks good.--Twilight Helryx 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

1. B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

• Everything is well sourced.--Twilight Helryx 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it broad in its coverage?

• As broad as this type of article can get.--Twilight Helryx 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

1. A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

2. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

3. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

• Obviously none. =P --Twilight Helryx 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

2. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

• After a quick web search, it a appears that there aren't any usable images for this bat specie.--Twilight Helryx 19:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

1. A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have

fair use rationales:

1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

2. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Congratulations! This article passed!