Wikipedia

Talk:Minneapolis Public Library

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Learn more about this page

Building (new Central)

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Since the building is now complete and functioning, shouldn't an up-to-date photograph or two be added here? Michael Hardy 23:03, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

God, what an awful building. Almost as bad as the one in Seattle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spike2021 (talk • contribs)

Have you ever actually been there? It's a beautiful building! It's absolutely not over-the-top like the Seattle one [1]. —Sesel 03:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, it's not that beautiful for much of the year, though. The wing-like roof that projects over the plaza is badly-designed for the location -- it collects large chunks of ice, which then fall 5 stories onto the plaza, quite dangerous to patrons entering the library, or waiting at the bus stop in front. So during winter, the plaza is marred by bright yellow crime-scene tape blocking off much of the plaza. (And winter in Minnesota lasts a good part of the year!) Another example of an architect building something which looks 'pretty' in his drawings, but which doesn't work well for the people who have to use it. T-bonham (talk) 03:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

history of the planetarium

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article says:

Until the 2002 closure and demolition of the old central library, the Minneapolis Planetarium found its home there, possessing a projector machine literally older than the space age itself (delivered and installed originally in 1954, three years before the launch of Sputnik I).

But I seem to recall that the biulding demolished in 2002 was built in 1961. Where was the projector installed? Michael Hardy 02:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

references

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not perfect, but they are there. i am removing the tag, also including info on the MPL-Hennepin merger.--Natcase 09:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

post-merger merge articles

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We should probably be getting ready to merge articles when the MPL is merged. There's an article for HPL which is pretty skimpy. when do we merge articles--Natcase 09:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't merge. The MPLS deserves an obituary. Or at least the beginnings of one.68.178.50.46 (talk) 00:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article Outlook Twenty Ten was recently created. I don't think it's notable enough for an independent article, but it may merit a mention here. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 20:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do it! davumaya 19:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adamson v. Minneapolis Public Library

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just added a section of the same name on the main page. Media stories on this matter may be found at http://web.mac.com/safelibraries/Adamson/MediaReports.html and are being linked here in the Talk page to make fact checking from primary sources easier for anyone interested.

Also, I created a redirect page from Adamson v. Minneapolis Public Library to this Minneapolis Public Library main page. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

History

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Article seems to be missing history. I added a photo of the first public library building and added T. B. Walker to the lead. The board disagreed with him, but he prevailed in founding a free public library. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Page Glosses Over Destruction of Minneapolis Library System (aka " Is Being Minnesota Nice.")

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article does not in any way address the "fiasco" (Minneapolis Star-Tribune) that the building of the new Central Library led to. After the qualifications for the post of director were altered to allow the appointment of a non-librarian, an outgoing Jesse Ventura administration member was chosen in 2003 as head of the Minneapolis Library System over the former director of the American Library Association. Expected State funding was cut by the incoming Governor Pawlenty and voter-approved bond sales were held off as wrangling erupted over whether to finish the new libraryor scrap it and stay in the temporary leased space, and whether and which branch city libraries should be closed. The decision to go ahead with the new showpiece library ultimately led to the collapse of the city library system, huge layoffs, and finally a difficult merger with the County library system. I will provide specific sources as time permits.68.178.50.46 (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minneapolis Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on Minneapolis Public Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Minneapolis_Public_Library&oldid=1209083677"