Talk:Minnesota's 2nd congressional district

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2018 vote counts

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I'm not an a data scientist specializing in elections, but I'm pretty certain that there weren't 33 trillion votes cast in the 2018 election for MN-02. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.17.89.181 (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You're correct. Why do you say that, though? —GoldRingChip 01:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
A previous version of the article had an error in the vote count. That has now been fixed. -Joe (Jaw959) (talk) 01:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- OK, thank you. —GoldRingChip 01:12, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed copyvio fix

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A proposed revision to this article is proposed here: Talk:Minnesota's 2nd congressional district/Temp. Only the introductory paragraph was lifted from the congressman's website. All the rest was original Wikipedia content.--G1076 00:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minnesota's 2nd congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008095823/http://minnesotaelectionresults.sos.state.mn.us/20101102/ElecRslts.asp?M=CG&CD=02 to http://minnesotaelectionresults.sos.state.mn.us/20101102/ElecRslts.asp?M=CG&CD=02

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic