This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article reads like someone's B- college essay. I have started to clean it up, primarily by breaking up the LONG paragraphs into smaller, more concentrated paragraphs. Part of the problem is that no pages link to this one. I have created a link on the "History of Romania" page to it, but there are many more pages that need to be backward linked here, so that this article can get the attention it so badly needs. I only hit it by accident (Random Article) and noticed the "Cleanup, Sep 2005" tag.
It also needs a lot of syntax work. Many of the sentances are overly convoluted.
Another problem: very few nouns are links to other Wikipedia articles.
No references, although occasionally in the text there was mention of "see link below." It should be re-referenced according to the Wikipedia standard.
Another possibility: is this article necessary? Sir Isaac Lime
As the tag says, this article needs a lot of cleanup. It is not encyclopedic at all.
I don't know... they don't receive a free seat in the parliament like the other 18 minorities... Anyway, this map is made to show those minorities that have little chance to show up in a normal ethnic map, because their low concentration (if you look on the map, most areas have under 20% minority population). If i would had put on this map the hungarian population (and the gypsy one), it would have got much more complicated (even in this map, of the minorities with under 100.000 members, i had to have some striped areas). If you want a map with the hungarian minority, there's one at county level (the one in this article is at municipality level) in the Hungarian minority in Romania article: Anonimu08:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
They didn't? That seems kinda strange considering they're the largest minority. I understand your reasons, anyways. Besides that, nice work on the map, it looks really good. I've added the other map you mentioned. —Khoikhoi08:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
That's exactly because they're the largest minority. They get seats in the parliament by normal electoral system (currently they have 32 seats). Anonimu08:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Minorities of Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Minorities of Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
