Talk:Minotaurasaurus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by The Ankylosauria Task Force (assessed as High-importance).

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Saichania in the picture?

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Why does the museum legend in the picture mention Saichania, not Minotaurasaurus? --2A01:E35:2E5B:C970:224:E8FF:FEB9:BFD1 (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's from before it was classified as such. FunkMonk (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Then shouldn't it be mentioned in the article that it was previously known under another name? --2A01:E35:2E5B:C970:224:E8FF:FEB9:BFD1 (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it ever was in any scientific publication. Museum labels are often preliminary. FunkMonk (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is it just me or are the nostril openings too large in the black and white restoration? FunkMonk (talk) 23:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Tarchia?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Per: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/zoj.12185/abstract FunkMonk (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minotaurasaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130920030007/http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/museum/branches/vvm.htm to http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/museum/branches/vvm.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic