Talk:Minsden Chapel

Despite the many reports, very little evidence exists to support the validity of any of these stories

By "very little evidence", do you mean no evidence?Graham 05:54, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Well, I think the photograph still exists. And certainly there are a number of eye-witness accounts. None of it is exactly firm and reliably backed-up, as far as I know. But I couldn't personally say for sure that there's *no* evidence. --David Edgar 08:01, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Access

There's now a couple of notices outside saying "no entry", probably for health and safety reasons in case it crumbles down on top of someone. But the stile over the fence is still there for people to access it... but I'm not a reliable source :-) –anemoneprojectors– 19:06, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Images

I have restored the 2016 image over the 2010 one which does not show the chapel as it is today. Jack1956 (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

I think there is little difference in how the chapel looks between 2010 and 2016, but my opinion is that the 2010 image shows more of the chapel than the 2016 one. I don't think it matters how recent the main photo is - otherwise photos of things would be changed on a regular basis. However, as you took the 2016 image and I took the 2010 image, it should be left to others to decide. anemoneprojectors 18:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Actually I think File:Minsden Chapel 2 (4648214892).jpg is better still, but again, I took the photo. anemoneprojectors 18:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

• I like that one, to be honest, and would have no objection to mine going into a Gallery on the page. Jack1956 (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh that's ok then. By the way have you considered uploading (or transfering) your photos to Wikimedia Commons, so they appear in the Commons category linked towards the bottom of the page? anemoneprojectors 19:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)