| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minuscule 2427 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editI wrote "20th" because the forgery probably happened around 1910-15. Of course we cannot rule out the 19th CE but the high times of forgerey were the early 20th. --Harnack (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Can it be said that the text possibly did not start out as a forgery but became one - ie 'someone' commissioned 'a perfect replica done in the original style', which then became an autonomous object: this has been known to happen (as is the tradition of copying existing manuscripts in a religions context. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC) (developing an entry of 09:43, 8 July 2014 (UTC))