Talk:Mirror symmetry (string theory)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ColonelHenry (talk · contribs) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

I rarely review articles in math because I try to avoid getting involved in areas of Wikipedia that touch upon my profession, but I couldn't pass this one up. This is a thorough and excellent article, well-prepared, well-sourced, well-formatted, quite comprehensive and informative--and I see that it would be informative for people who would like to know more who would approach this from a comprehension of math comparable with the completion of a good secondary school education. While the language is technical because of its mathematical nature, it is easily accessible. Images checked and without any fair/free content issues. I do not see any issues regarding criteria compliance that would delay promotion to GA. --ColonelHenry (talk) 15:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·