Talk:Mis Romances/GA2

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Tbhotch in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 9 months waiting, I'll take it Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 00:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh my, I believe this is the first time you've ever reviewed any of my articles for GA, no? Erick (talk) 00:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yes, this is the first time. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality (prose is clear and concise, without exceeding quotations, or spelling and grammar errors):  
    B. MoS compliance (included, but not limited to: lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists):  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources (it also includes an appropriate reference section):  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary (including direct quotations):  
    C. No original research:  
    D. No copyright violations:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    edit wars, multiple edits not related to the GAN process, etc. (this excludes blatant vandalism):  
  6. Does it contain images (or other media) to illustrate (or support) the topic?
    A. Images (and other media) are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images (and other media) are provided where possible and are relevant, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
Resolved comments from Tbhotch
;Infobox
  • Length - It says 38:55 but the tracklisting adds 38:32
Lead
  • "Los Angeles, ..." ... "London, England" -> Pick either "Los Angeles, California" and "London, England" or "Los Angeles" and "London"
  • Unlink LA, London and England per WP:OVERLINK
  • Link "Amor 3x" to its article
  • "neither a critical or a commercial" -> shouldn't it be "nor"?
  • "It reached number one" -> "Additionaly, it reached number one"
Background
  • "Produced by Armando Manzanero and arranged by Bebu Silvetti," -> change it to active voice
  • "and was the first record" -> "recording"(?)
  • "released" is used 4 times in the paragraph
  • "record" is used 9 times as a noun and twice as a verb
Musical style
  • ""Cómo Duele" and "Al Que Me Siga" composed by" -> "Cómo Duele" and "Al Que Me Siga", composed by
Promotion
  • Link Billboard
  • "To promote Mis Romances, Luis Miguel" -> You have written his second name only throughout
  • The second single, "Cómo Duele" -> The second single, "Cómo Duele",
  • "number one song" -> number-one song
  • Link Chula Vista, CA
  • "shows in the United States.[34] Miguel's concerts in the United States ... After his performances in the United States.
  • on 14 December 2002 in the Dominican Republic -> DR is linked but it was previously mentioned at "Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico"
  • The Los Angeles Times -> The Los Angeles Times
  • and its predecessors as well as pop tracks -> and its predecessors, as well as pop tracks
Reception
  • "noting Miguel's rendition of "Perfidia" had been covered by several artists" -> This line is unclear
  • "that while the album's production was "bolstered" by Miguel's vocals, she called it "predictable"" -> I suggest to rewrite it.
  • "Fernando Gonzalez wrote for The Washington Post highlighting" -> he wrote what?
  • The second paragraph uses "record" 4 times
See also
  • List of number-one Billboard Latin Pop Albums from the 2000s -> List of number-one Billboard Latin Pop Albums from the 2000s
References
  • 2 - Allmusic should not be in italics
  • 3 - Directes -> Diretes
  • Sources 1 and 4 should look like 1956 Winter Olympics#References and 1956_Winter_Olympics#Further reading
  • 6 - Alfonso Quiñones (author) is missing
  • 11 - Link Chicago Tribune
  • 12 - Unlink Chicago Tribune
  • 15 - Allmusic should not be in italics
  • 17 - Allmusic should not be in italics
  • 27 - La Prensa (Buenos Aires) -> La Prensa (Panama City)
  • 31 - Link El Universal
  • 39 - Link Los Angeles Times
  • 40 - Link Chicago Sun-Times and Sun-Times Media Group
  • 41 - Unlink Chicago Sun-Times and Sun-Times Media Group
  • 44 - Link United Press International; it should not be in italics
  • 54 - Reyes, Salvador Franco -> Franco Reyes, Salvador
  • 55 - Cámara Uruguaya de Productores de Fonogramas should not be in italics
  • 61 - "los medios no quieren cubrir sus conferencias de prensa y un buen sector" -> drop "y un buen sector" as meaningless (or the paragraph from "Cansados de" as irrelevant to the page).
  • 62 - Allmusic should not be in italics
  • 63, 64 and 65 - Billboard is overlinked
  • 6, 52, 59 - They have translated titles, but other Spanish language sources don't. Choose one style.

Article on hold. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 03:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just a heads up, I probably won't start working on this until Friday due to my busy work schedule. Erick (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
I believed I've addressed most of the issues you brought up. For the length time, I used what was on AllMusic since it's the only reliable source I trust with it and the album charts template automatically makes refs 63-65 link Billboard magazine. Erick (talk) 18:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
OK then. I don't see any other issue, so I pass its nomination. Good job. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 01:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply