Talk:Mishkenos HoRoim
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Superm401 in topic Lack of sources
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
They are not anti zionism in particular
editthis is a group that was formed to hold the old style Jerusalem chareidim in tact against all modern influences and movements, why should we put them in one single category of being opposed to Zionism?--יודל 14:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Yidel, this group is known for being closer to Neturei Karta than anyone else. They recently held a Yortzeit tish for Reb Amrom Bloi zt'l. I have seen many pamphlets signed by Reb Rabinowitz zt'l referring to the Zionist tumoh asking for the quick dissolvement of the Zionist lie. --Eidah 14:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Holy brother, if they are`close it does not mean that their relationship is defined by anti Zionism feelings it could very well be a whole host of reasons which has nothing to do with Zionism at all. the sons of reb amrom are davening there so they hosted the seuda. I agree with you that they are more anti then all other chareidy groups but its nothing particular with Zionism they want to live the ancient traditional way of life of their ancestors. don't be so obsessed with one single issue here.--יודל 14:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'd suggest that you get working equally on deleting the Category:Religious Zionism from all articles which by your norms are inappropriate for that category. --Eidah 14:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion but if u want to proof some point here be aware that u r not allowed to disrupt wikipedia to proof a point. i went over all those ion that category i don't see any problem, they are a selective few who very well are defined by their activism and life to that category. This article is not at all defined by their opposition to Zionism--יודל 14:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'd suggest that you get working equally on deleting the Category:Religious Zionism from all articles which by your norms are inappropriate for that category. --Eidah 14:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dear Holy brother, if they are`close it does not mean that their relationship is defined by anti Zionism feelings it could very well be a whole host of reasons which has nothing to do with Zionism at all. the sons of reb amrom are davening there so they hosted the seuda. I agree with you that they are more anti then all other chareidy groups but its nothing particular with Zionism they want to live the ancient traditional way of life of their ancestors. don't be so obsessed with one single issue here.--יודל 14:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Lack of sources
editSomeone added "The only evidence of the existence of this group to be found on the internet is the picture shown on this Wikipedia article." to the article. I've moved that here, but added a verify tag, since there is only one source (a quote). Superm401 - Talk 23:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)