Talk:Miss Zhao's suicide
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A02:C7F:32BD:1900:E51F:8085:B18D:689D in topic This photo is used incorrectly
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge of Draft:Miss Zhao's suicide into Miss Zhao's suicide
editPlease compare and consolidate. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Both articles were created by the same editor. The one in main space was created a week before your review of the draft. They seemed to have worked a bit more on the one in main space, as there is one more sub section (4.3) and also else it seems to have more info. The AfC review process was a bit unlucky for the not so experienced editor, as the first one was denied because another draft with the same title also exists and then you declined because there already exists one in mainspace. I guess they grew a bit impatient after the first decline as it was created the same day of the decline. Maybe a better coordination with the Wikipedia project of the Boston College of which the editor states they are a part of would help our AfC reviewers. Maybe an AfC category for Students drafts? I'd just leave the article and the draft as they are and wait for the draft to be archived.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- There has been little participation on the discussion page since months, yet I believe this discussion is redundant as both articles are very similar and to one in main space seems better elaborated. Could we just close the discussion so readers won't be disturbed by the discussion header? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect added, rather than merging, given that I could see no unique referenced content. Klbrain (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- There has been little participation on the discussion page since months, yet I believe this discussion is redundant as both articles are very similar and to one in main space seems better elaborated. Could we just close the discussion so readers won't be disturbed by the discussion header? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Done
This photo is used incorrectly
editIt is used as a photo at the bottom of the article as a Chinese leaders wife photos on that article confirm it's a photo of his wife with children. 2A02:C7F:32BD:1900:E51F:8085:B18D:689D (talk) 09:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)