edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Missal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 23 August 2023

edit

Cavanaugh, Stephen E. (2011). Anglicans and the Roman Catholic Church: Reflections on Recent Developments. Ignatius Press. p. 105. ISBN 9781586174996. The first edition of the Anglican Missal was published in London by the Society of Saints Peter and Paul in 1921; the first American edition appeared in 1943, published by the Frank Gavin Liturgical Foundation of Mount Sinai, Long Island, N.Y., and in 1947 a revised edition was published (reprinted in 1961); the publication rights were given (or sold) to the Anglican Parishes Association in the 1970s, which reprinted the 1947 edition. Polis24 (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Polis24: What portion of this information would you like inserted into the article? Please put the particular phrasing you wish to be used in quotation marks. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The way it was in the footnote in older wikipedia articles before it was removed. Polis24 (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Not done. Unclear what changes are requested. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I already found it written in the wikipedia article instead of the footnote. Polis24 (talk) 23:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply