Talk:Mississippi Highway 607

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mississippi Highway 607. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150114033116/http://mdot.ms.gov/documents/planning/Maps/State%20Highway%20Maps/Statewide%20Map-%20Front%20Side.pdf to http://mdot.ms.gov/documents/planning/Maps/State%20Highway%20Maps/Statewide%20Map-%20Front%20Side.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 607/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Prose

Lede

• Lede is a little short - could we bulk it up a little? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• Because it's the main piece of info as to what the article is - can we link highway in the lede? In the UK for example, this has a different meaning (we'd say dual carriageway or motorway). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Linked the specific article. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• southern terminus - could we say this a bit more simply? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Sure. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• U.S. Route 90 (US 90) - we then shorten similar roads, without having defined them, like US 11. Is there a better way to do this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• Maintained by MDOT in infobox isn't strictly cited in body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• I actually think this bit is good info for the lede. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

General

• INFINITY Science Center pipes to a redirect. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Done, title must've changed since. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Signage for MS 607 at I-59's exit 1 - quite a poor caption. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Better? Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Could we get some alt text? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• Done. Nova Chrysalia (Talk) 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

• The History section could probably be written a bit less frantically, and explain a bit more that the road is the remnants of US 90. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• The History doesn't seem extremely clear when the road became the 607 - 1967? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• External links doesn't have any links, just a portal, can probably cull. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Review meta comments

• I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)