Talk:Mississippi Highway 69
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Courcelles in topic GA Review
 | Mississippi Highway 69 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 6, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 69/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 00:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
I’ll take this one. Courcelles (talk) 00:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- “Before the route was designated in 1941, it was ”. The road? A prior MS 69 designation? Needs a ce.
- need a citation for AL 14 being the other side of the line.
- inflate your dollar figures
- Contract let by seems awkward phrasing
- Changed to "awarded". Nova Crystallis (Talk) 00:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Columbus's. No need for second trailing s
- I different city of the same name and I still mess this up... Nova Crystallis (Talk) 00:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Courcelles (talk) 00:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Done with fixes. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 00:42, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, promoting. Courcelles (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2018 (UTC)