Talk:Missouri Route 162

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ed! in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Missouri Route 162/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    • Any info on when the diamond interchange at I-55 was built? And any cost there?
    • "and its section from Clarkton to Gideon was paved one year later." -- Any cost on this?
    • As with Route 164, I can't immediately tell if the first sentence in the route description is a traffic count for this route. Is it, and if not can that number be found?
    • Finally, perhaps would be good to include if there are any landmarks or notable businesses on this one, or if it's an all residential road. I get it's a rural place but the information seems a bit basic as is now.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass Sources are largely maps, but not spotting any holes in citing. —Ed!(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass No problems there.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass No problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass No problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    • No images here, technically possible but not feasible unless we had someone on WP living nearby, which isn't likely. Any chance for a map?
  7. Other:
    Dup links, dab links, external links and copyvio tools all showing no problems.
    Source spotcheck Ref 7 and Ref 14 are appropriately referenced to the content in the article.

On Hold Pending a few fixes. —Ed!(talk) 03:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Good work on this one! Passing for GA. —Ed!(talk) 20:54, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply