Talk:Mist lift

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.makai.com/news.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba (Talk) 10:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Change name to steam lift?

edit

I have upgraded the article to clarify the key concepts, add citations and describe variants from other inventors.

It seems to me this article should be devoted to the general technique of using seawater steam to loft multiphase water to great heights. The form of the multiphase flow or the shape of the vessel seem like incidental details to me. If this is so, "mist" is specific to a particular embodiment favored by ridgway, but not by beck or zener. Seems to me they are all "steam lift" approaches, ( a term used by Beck in his 2001 patent), and so Steam lift or Steam lift pumps should be the title of the article.

I shall make the change in the future if some significant time has past and the suggestion appears uncontroversial. J JMesserly (talk) 09:27, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mist lift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply