Talk:Mr. Bug Goes to Town

Animation: American / Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

There WAS an official home video release

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This film as released on VHS in 1989 by Republic Pictures under the title of "Hoppity Goes to Town". --JFP (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

There were legal LaserDisk releases of both Hoppity and Gulliver's Travels. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 12:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

About Mr. Bug Goes to Town Being the Only American Non-Disney Animated Film in the 1940s

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't get it. How come Mr. Bug Goes to Town was the only American animated film not produced by Disney during the 40s? Was it because the other studios were too busy producing live-action films and slapstick cartoons, was it because the other studios wanted to make some animated films but they decided not to after the box office failure of said film and the attack on Pearl Harbor, was it because they didn't wanna copy the Disney formula and/or outdo Walt Disney himself, was it because feature-length animation wasn't their thing? Also, why weren't some of the foreign animated films of that decade released and/or distributed internationally? Was it because the other studios wanted to do so, but they didn't get a chance to get the rights to those films, was it because they weren't allowed to get the rights to or distribute foreign animated films during that period, was it because they were worried that they would flop at the box office if they ever did that, or was it because releasing and distributing them internationally wasn't their thing? --Ktommy (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mr. Bug Goes to Town. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140104212638/http://www.allmovieguide.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=16:182768 to http://www.allmovieguide.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=16:182768

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Recently"

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Apparently, that's 15 years ago. 2A02:AA1:1148:DE33:4825:10B:BAEE:2DFF (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic