Talk:Mistley

East Anglia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mistley Quay

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why are a couple of editors constantly deleting information about the fencing off of Mistley Quay? The bare bones are as follows: In September 2008 a 2-metre high, 130-metre long fence was erected across the quay. A protest group was formed to object to the fence, claiming that it ended 500 years of free access to the water. [1] This seems to me to be entirely appropriate information to include. Could those who disagree please discuss here, rather than just delete? Thanks. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 07:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thorn Quay Warehouse

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The information about Thorn Quay Warehouse added on 16th March 2014 does not fall within WP:NOTNEWS, because 'editors are encouraged to include current and up-to-date information within [Wikipedia's] coverage' and 'including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterEssexHeritage (talk • contribs) 21:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mistley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120413202753/http://www.visit-manningtree.co.uk/history/1700.html to http://www.visit-manningtree.co.uk/history/1700.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic