Talk:Mobile number portability

Sj: Pakistan has launched MNP and will be available to user on 26th March 2007 (Monday)

Suspected Copyright infringement

The additions of Aleksmayer seem to be a copyright infringement, although I have not yet located an online source. The lengthy text is cited as "Extract from Logica CMG’s Operator Manual". I will remove the text until it can be proven free, and then its content should be merged in and not merly copied. jnothman ^talk 07:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

United States

can someone add this? --76.8.67.2 (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Pakistan

Pakistan is not in the "Middle East & Africa" region of the world, by far. Middle East ends at Iraq! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.50.73 (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

UK / Doner-led porting

The first paragraph (which says basically that Donor-led porting is bad and Recipient-led is good) looks POV to me. Perhaps Recipient-led is better (I wouldn't know), but the wording could be more neutral, or citations could be provided to prove the point that Recipient-led is better. What about the point that Recipient-led porting could lead to unscrupulous providers switching numbers to their network without the customer's consent ("slamming")? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.182.134 (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

The whole Technical details section is too UK-centric. If the UK uses a different method from the rest of the world (does it? Did it change in 2009, or not?) then the global standard should be described and the UK differences outlined in a separate subsection. Citations are needed, too. 81.136.202.93 (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

"United Kingdom and India are the only exceptions" certainly doesn't seem quite correct – Germany doesn't use a Porting Authorisation Code, but you definitely still need to contact your current provider first in order to release your number for porting. JanTH (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Legal rights when you want to port a number when leaving a company, or made redundant

Does anyone know the law around porting a number when -you leave a company -you are made redundant -you have had the phone number for a set period of time -you have had to pay for any private calls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.91.171 (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

If the company provided the contract - then you are highly unlikely to have any rights to the number they provided for you. IANAL though. Paulw1128 (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

provider unavailable

If the service provider suddenly goes out of business, ceases to function -- is there any way to port out the trapped phone number?-71.174.188.32 (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mobile number portability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160107102222/http://www.siget.gob.sv/index.php/novedades/noticias/1-noticias-ciudadano/2507-la-portabilidad-numerica-una-historia-de-exito-otro-compromiso-cumplido to http://www.siget.gob.sv/index.php/novedades/noticias/1-noticias-ciudadano/2507-la-portabilidad-numerica-una-historia-de-exito-otro-compromiso-cumplido
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060810043015/http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/944.pdf to http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/944.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517153227/http://www.portare.md/en/pages/porting%20procedure%20for%20mobile%20numbers to http://www.portare.md/en/pages/porting%20procedure%20for%20mobile%20numbers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)