Talk:Modality Partnership

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... The contents are all referenced from respectable independent sources. You will see that I have removed a number of promotional edits from ModalityPartnership. 'This is an NHS general practice. Advertising is not permitted - nor required. It has been mentioned as a significant organisation in several official UK government publications and by the then Prime Minister. If someone thinks it is promotional please expalain which part of the article you consider to be promotional.Rathfelder (talk) 18:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Indeed, the G11 template specifically says "In its current form it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic." Neither criterion seems to apply here. I don't think that when Rathfelder created the article, they only did so to promote the subject. I also don't think it would require a fundamental rewrite in order to be encyclopedic - besides a few promotional words, it appears to be worded encyclopedic enough that G11 does not apply. I've removed the CSD template from the page for now.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 18:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you. The rather gushing descriptions come from independent sources. Probably because they are reporting on plans and ambitions rather than delivery. Rathfelder (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)