Talk:Modular rocket

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Modular rocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111111084921/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ssc/commercial_launch_services/launch_vehicles/index.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ssc/commercial_launch_services/launch_vehicles/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207085028/http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/nepa_docs/review/documents_progress/spacex_texas_launch_site_environmental_impact_statement/media/SpaceX_Texas_Launch_Site_Draft_EIS_V1.pdf to http://1.usa.gov/YtxBzo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Modular rocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100223185126/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/1999/LockheedMartinNamesNewRocketAtlasV.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/1999/LockheedMartinNamesNewRocketAtlasV.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

"Propellant crossfeed" redirects back to the same article

While it's nice to know that propellant cross feed was considered for Falcon Heavy, it would really be nice to get more information on it. How much more payload could it lift to LEO with perfect cross feed? Even a simple application of text-book formulas would be nice to have here instead of a pointless link. We know (don't we?) the type and mass of propellant on the strap on boosters and the center core. What if we burn the strap ons shorter and center core accordingly longer, without having to drag the strap-on weight? In a three years old reddit post somebody claimed: "As the website states http://www.spacex.com/falcon-heavy the payload increase from 45,000 kg to 53,000 kg with cross-feed." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.214.28.204 (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

"Asparagus staging" redirecting here?

Just because FH was going to use crossfeed on 2013?

What the hell? there was a good article explaining what was asparagus staging and crosfeed with gifs and such, and now this points here? WHO WAS THE GENIOUS? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.83.149.85 (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Indeed, What the hell?!!½ Knowing that there was a proper article is just an embarrassment. How did the community manage to shoot itself in the foot so badly? 130.234.244.201 (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)