![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 24 August 2020. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lem's Solaris and Mogo
editSeems to me there's more than a hint of Stanislaw Lem's famous "Solaris" here (I've never even heard of this particular series, since I stopped reading 'Green Lantern' decades ago. ;)
I don't think I have to stretch any argument too far to make this case, even not knowing anything about this storyline: it's a pretty unique concept (i.e. not the idea of magic planets per se; but planets which "shapeshift" somehow, using regular, but higher-order physics).
So shouldn't this be mentioned in the article, then? After chasing down whether this supposition is true or not, of course.
Pazouzou 02:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
It's also the plot of Colossus and the Crab, a 1977 science fiction novel by the British author Dennis Feltham Jones (writing as D. F. Jones). It is the third and final volume in "The Colossus Trilogy" and a sequel to Jones's 1974 novel The Fall of Colossus. The first book was made into a film The Forbin Project, and reportedly was to be remade by Ron Howard starring Will Smith, unfortunately which has not happened yet.
Also, the Wikipedia article for Ego the Living Planet (a similar article) links to Boltzmann Brains, a thought experiment with a similar premise (though this thought experiment is irrefutably nonsensical garbage).
Prophecy
editI think the description of the prophecy is a bit off; I thought the blink bombs were tools of the Children of the White Lobe, and I remember that they did wind up being central to the use of Blink Bombs in the actual attempt by the Sinestro Corps to kill Mogo. If anyone has a copy, can you correct that or point me out wrong? Complex.confusion (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mogo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027122243/http://glcorps.dcuguide.com/profile.php?name=mogo to http://glcorps.dcuguide.com/profile.php?name=mogo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Independent sources
edit@Rhino131, you said that there's a reliable independent source, but which one is it? There's so much in-universe cruft in the sources list, that I can't find it. I suspect that once we trim this down to whatever is in that source, that we won't have enough length left to justify a stand-alone article anyway. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Oiyarbepsy See the reception section. There is a chapter discussing Mogo in the book Green Lantern and Philosophy. If this article were to be merged into a list, that information would go with it. But that would be done through a merge proposal, not a redirect (which is essentially a sneaky way to delete an article without gaining consensus). Rhino131 (talk) 04:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)