 | Mokshabhumi was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 19, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mokshabhumi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 15:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
permalink to version reviewed This article falls majorly short of the GA criterion of comprehensiveness. The lead is insufficiently long, the plot synopsis doesn't actually explain the plot (describe what exactly happens in the book), and the reception does not incorporate any reviews, but rather just lists the awards. Additionally, most book articles have a small Background section that describes the author and any background info about the book, like conceptualization and writing (see Tolkien: A Cultural Phenomenon). I'm willing to put it on hold for a couple of days if you want, but imo it would be better to take your time to work on it and renominate later. AryKun (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Courtesy ping @Wallflowernepal:
- No response from nominator for over 1 week from the start of the review, so I have gone and failed it. AryKun (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2022 (UTC)